A leading Italian cleric on Saturday defended the decision to adopt a Vatican-approved policy which exempts bishops from having to report cases of suspected child sex abuse to the police.
"The Vatican requires national laws to be respected, and we know that there is no such duty (to report abuse) under Italian law," Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, head of the Italian Bishops' Conference, told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting in Genoa.
The conference published guidelines on Friday which stipulated that clergy are under no obligation to inform the authorities about suspected abuse but have a "moral duty" to act to protect the vulnerable and "contribute to the common good". If they took their 'moral duty' seriously, there would be no pedophiles in the priesthood.
The guidelines sparked fury among victim support groups, with the US-based Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP) deploring the "stunning, depressing and irresponsible contradiction between what Vatican officials say about abuse, and do about abuse."
The Church has repeatedly been accused by victims of covering up abuse by priests and simply moving predator clerics from one diocese to another rather than reporting them, thereby putting other children at risk.
Bishops in possession of information on possible abuse cases have been required by the Vatican to report to the authorities since 2010, but only in those countries where they are required to do so under national law.
Bagnasco said the decision to adopt the Vatican's policy had been taken in part to protect victims who may not want to press charges. Emphasis on 'in part'.
"What is important is to respect the will of the victims and their relatives, who may not want to report the abuse, for personal reasons," Bagnasco said.
"We need to be careful that we in the clergy do not undermine the right to privacy, discretion and confidentiality, and the right of the victims to not be 'exposed' in the public square", he said. Good grief! What is the rest of the 'in part'? The Cardinal is not lying here, but to put the emphasis on protecting the victims rather than protecting the church's exposed hind quarters, is simply ludicrous.
The Vatican was denounced by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in February for failing to stamp out predatory priests, and urged to hand over suspected abusers for prosecution.
Pope Francis has defended the Church, saying it has done more than "any other institution" in tackling pedophilia, and last weekend he appointed a woman who had been molested by a priest as a child as part of a new commission on fighting clerical sexual abuse.
Comparing the Catholic church to other institutions has nothing to do with whether or not it is doing the right thing. Part of the reason it has done more than any other institution is that its priests and bishops have committed more atrocities than any other institution, in my estimation, exponentially more.
I wonder if anyone in the Vatican has actually prayed about this? If anyone has actually listened to God about this? If anyone has repented about the abuse, the enabling, the covering up, the treatment of victims trying to come to terms with the abuse? Somehow, I doubt it.
"The Vatican requires national laws to be respected, and we know that there is no such duty (to report abuse) under Italian law," Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, head of the Italian Bishops' Conference, told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting in Genoa.
 |
| Cardinal Bagnasco |
The conference published guidelines on Friday which stipulated that clergy are under no obligation to inform the authorities about suspected abuse but have a "moral duty" to act to protect the vulnerable and "contribute to the common good". If they took their 'moral duty' seriously, there would be no pedophiles in the priesthood.
The guidelines sparked fury among victim support groups, with the US-based Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP) deploring the "stunning, depressing and irresponsible contradiction between what Vatican officials say about abuse, and do about abuse."
The Church has repeatedly been accused by victims of covering up abuse by priests and simply moving predator clerics from one diocese to another rather than reporting them, thereby putting other children at risk.
Bishops in possession of information on possible abuse cases have been required by the Vatican to report to the authorities since 2010, but only in those countries where they are required to do so under national law.
Bagnasco said the decision to adopt the Vatican's policy had been taken in part to protect victims who may not want to press charges. Emphasis on 'in part'.
"What is important is to respect the will of the victims and their relatives, who may not want to report the abuse, for personal reasons," Bagnasco said.
"We need to be careful that we in the clergy do not undermine the right to privacy, discretion and confidentiality, and the right of the victims to not be 'exposed' in the public square", he said. Good grief! What is the rest of the 'in part'? The Cardinal is not lying here, but to put the emphasis on protecting the victims rather than protecting the church's exposed hind quarters, is simply ludicrous.
The Vatican was denounced by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in February for failing to stamp out predatory priests, and urged to hand over suspected abusers for prosecution.
Pope Francis has defended the Church, saying it has done more than "any other institution" in tackling pedophilia, and last weekend he appointed a woman who had been molested by a priest as a child as part of a new commission on fighting clerical sexual abuse.
Comparing the Catholic church to other institutions has nothing to do with whether or not it is doing the right thing. Part of the reason it has done more than any other institution is that its priests and bishops have committed more atrocities than any other institution, in my estimation, exponentially more.
I wonder if anyone in the Vatican has actually prayed about this? If anyone has actually listened to God about this? If anyone has repented about the abuse, the enabling, the covering up, the treatment of victims trying to come to terms with the abuse? Somehow, I doubt it.
No comments:
Post a Comment